Search for: "Rose v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 12:59 pm
TiVo v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 5:18 am
Leslie (Arizona State), Lyrissa Lidsky (Missouri), Mary-Rose Papandrea (North Carolina), Jennifer E. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
These private citizens and citizens' groups include Michigan Decency Action Council, Inc., Judy Rose, Dar Vander Ark, and Black Hills Citizens for a Better Community (collectively "Non-City Defendants-Appellees"). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Rose is a straightforward one: certiorari should be denied. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
Partner Steve Cikes also has extensive appellate experience, helping to secure victories in cases involving vested rights (Rose v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes commented on the recent statement issued by the PEB in this regard. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:49 am
City of Houston v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm
SullivanMary–Rose PapandreaChapter 9The Story of Pickering v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
United States District Court, D. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Addressing the defendants’ challenges to the jury’s finding of liability on the employee’s Sec. 1983 claim the court noted that the right to intimate association was first recognized by the Supreme Court in 1984 in Roberts v United States Jaycees. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 4:20 pm
The DOJ filed the case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
In Meyer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
The Fourth Circuit ruled last week in IRAP v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Gail Markels and George Rose contend that California’s law restricting the sale of such games to minors is, at a practical level, unnecessary because it “empower[s] state bureaucrats to do what parents and retailers are already doing at no cost to taxpayers. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
" Haag Trucking Co. and Rose Maxine Haag v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:11 pm
Rose, F. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:59 pm
Today’s oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
The chair of the Estate and Trust Legislative Affairs Committee of the State Bar of Texas Real Estate, Probate, and Trust Law Section said the new subsection “appears to be an attempt to statutorily overrule the decision in Kappus v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
" In State of Indiana v. [read post]
