Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 861 - 880 of 17,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Inexplicably, tragedies like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921 don't count. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
To that end, this Essay analyzes an undisturbed line of Supreme Court cases from 1980-1990 – United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
This particular call for evidence seeks views on how Ofcom should measure user numbers on the relevant user-to-user parts of in-scope services and indeed what counts as a “user. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:48 am by Dan Bressler
Torres’ decision to disqualify the firm and partner Edward Shohat, defendant and asset manager Luis Fernando Vuteff said a precedential case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:58 am by Christopher G. Hill
The Court then examined the negligence per se count plead based upon the Virginia state building codes and state real estate licensing statutes. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Most Scope 3 emissions are someone else’s Scope 1 or 2 emissions, so there have also been complaints about double counting, but the purpose of accounting for Scope 3 emissions is not to come up with an overall national emissions inventory; other programs do that. [read post]