Search for: "State v. Collins" Results 861 - 880 of 2,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action alleging legal malpractice against the law firm defendants (see Shaya B. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”In addition, Thomas argued that allowing federal courts to overturn a state prisoner’s conviction and sentence was an “intru[sion] on state sovereignty … [that] overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce societal norms through criminal law. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Moseley Collins
Leave to amend is appropriate when there is a reasonable probability that the defect in the complaint can be cured by amendment or when the complaint can be liberally construed to state a cause of action and the plaintiff has not been afforded an opportunity to amend, as stated in City of Chula Vista v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
The new proposed jury instruction follows the recent New Mexico Supreme Court case of State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:53 am by GuestPost
In R (on the application of Negassi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 386 (Admin) Collins J. considered the case for damages for breach of Article 8 arising out of the Supreme Court decision that the prohibition on subsequent asylum seekers working was unlawful in the context of the Reception Directive. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The libel trial in the case of Blake v Fox begun on 22 November 2023 before Collins Rice J. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopoulos looks at the effect that the Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]