Search for: "State v. D. M. B."
Results 861 - 880
of 3,627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 4:07 pm
It would extend the B2B and “employee” exceptions through December 31, 2022 (proposed section 154(m) & (n)). [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
The written law relied on was S4(3) of the Societies Act, which states that the Registrar may refuse to register a society if inter alia its name is identical to that of an existing society. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:20 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
… V. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Finarelli v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
[b.] [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
District Judge Robert M. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The Magistrates had refused to state a case for the consideration of the High Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
First, the relevant legislation consists of Regulations 1308/2013 (Recital 97 and Articles 93 and 103(2)) and 1151/2012 (Recital 32 and Articles 4(b)-(c), 12 and 13). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
(b) The second point is about the way a reviewing officer treats medical evidence, as against the authority’s own advisors. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Briefly put, the statute repeats parts of the common law definition of defamation, see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559, comment b, which the Alaska Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Aside from cost of healthcare services increasing, insurance premiums have also been affected by the merging of physician practices with hospitals in states like California. [read post]
