Search for: "State v. Dowe" Results 861 - 880 of 953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 11:27 am by admin
United States into the promulgated rule.[5] There was, of course, some interesting and important dicta in the Daubert opinion, but the authors do a disservice to the bar to repeat the dicta as though they were good law. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
In Jameel v Dow Jones at [32] –4 [41] a challenge to the presumption of damage as incompatible with article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights was rejected by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Schachtman
The Supreme Court’s celebrated 1993 decision in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Bloomberg and Dow Jones & Co. file FOIA requests with the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and related cases.[6]” The court in Ladd Furniture v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Dow Chemical Co., 473 Mich. 63, 701 N.W.2d 684 (Mich. 2005). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]