Search for: "State v. So " Results 861 - 880 of 117,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 11:13 am
So holds the Ninth Circuit.That distinction is definitely tough to defend. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by MBettman
  In doing so, the trial judge relied on Dayton v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
So it may be expected that the State will appeal this ruling to the New Mexico Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:10 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  When designating the horse as New Jersey’s state animal in 1977 Governor Bryne said: “The founding fathers of our state thought so highly of the horse that they included it in our state seal. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
On July 14, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Chief Justice Kelly’s majority opinion in Adair v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
The transcript of Judge Edgardo Ramos’ Wednesday hearing in Restis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
  In DISMISSING the appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, stated: Here, defendant sought a protective order and the court denied its motion, affording plaintiff the full relief sought in opposition (see Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes, 271 AD2d 558 [2000]). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix Chambers.
Extradition in the public interest would, however, generally be proportionate under Article 8(2) (Norris v Government of the United States of America (No.2) [2010] 2 AC 487). [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This injunction is so broad that it would bar Athena from making its product in Idaho, distributing it from a facility in Nevada, and selling it to Connecticut consumers.Allergan argues that Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:53 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
The Utah Court of Appeals recently filed a memorandum decision regarding an appeal in the case of State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am by Andrew Frisch
  In denying Plaintiffs’ motion, the Court discussed, at length the state of Third Circuit law applicable to so-called hybrid (state law and FLSA) cases. [read post]