Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 12:31 pm
Taylor, Student Director, Kyle A. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 3:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
" Sheryl Crowder Taylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The magistrate judge's order states that the filter [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:51 pm
Per Sweets v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. at 410, 120 S.Ct. at 1522 (“[A]n unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application of federal law. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
The Honorable Judge William Fletcher Taylor-ed to a T.Menendez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
The basic issue the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit was asked to resolve in the Taylor case was whether or not Taylor’s employee contributions to the Retirement System, required by State law, was “disposable income” within the meaning of the federal Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Doyle v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
This case was also discussed in an earlier post: Did Kentucky's Dram Shop Act Survive Taylor v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
’“ Taylor v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:22 am
LEXIS 37602, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Taylor Jr. v. [read post]
