Search for: "Tea v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
There is no duty to warn of dangers that are obvious or a matter of common knowledge (see for example, Bogle and others v McDonalds Restaurants Ltd [2002] All ER (D) 436 where the court found that McDonalds were not negligent in supplying cups of hot tea and coffee without a warning as consumers generally knew that there was a risk of scalding if hot drinks were spilled). [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:31 am
” Ferolito Ferolito v Vultaggio (99 AD3d 19 [1st Dept 2012]), was one of several appellate decisions in the sprawling AriZona Iced Tea litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
The roots of this alliance trace back to the Tea Party movement, which galvanized opposition to President Obama’s policies, notably the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
With the exception of college-educated women driven to the polls by the Supreme Court’s recent overruling of Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
in reply to imagethief -> Latest China Hearsay: Apple CEO Meets With China’s Vice Premier: A Guide http://t.co/oAbpdTIF -> King & Wood: New Law on Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases Strengthens the Protection for Employees http://t.co/FN6d4DFp -> Clifford Chance: FCPA: Facilitating Payments v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
I'd also add granola bars, lip balm, sticky notes, tissues, mints, a camera and, perhaps, your favorite tea bags. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:14 am
The case originated as a result of a decision of the Irish Revenue to refuse Bookfinders request to refund its Value Added Tax (VAT) payments for the bread, hot meatball sandwiches, tea and coffee that Bookfinders sold under the Subway franchise for the years 2004-2005. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
An image from the government’s complaint shows the difference (U.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:43 am
In one of my cases, Nunez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:49 am
.
**Technology and Policy Issues With Acquiring Digital Collections
http://www.llrx.com/features/digitalcollections.htm
Roger V. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Tea partiers, in a first, find themselves nodding in agreement - Back in DC, at least twenty really shady meetings happen at Capital Grille. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Zemel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:52 am
² Sutton v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Start with Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:50 am
And it's about State of Ohio v. [read post]
