Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 861 - 880
of 8,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
See also United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:26 am
" Respondent's website states that it is located in Laguna Beach, while the petitioner presented testimony that Laguna Beach is often referred to as "Laguna. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 2:08 pm
Prior to moving to the United States, the family often vacationed to South Florida. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Spica v Viera, 2020 WL 13401915 ( S.D. Florida, 2020)
7 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm
” Based on the available evidence, the Court found that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the United States or Italy was the habitual residence of the children prior to Respondent’s alleged wrongful retention in February 2020. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
Respondent averred that Petitioner consented to Respondent removing the children to the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
Respondent argued that under Ozaltin, which she stated is “the leading case” on this issue, an award of fees is clearly inappropriate because she acted in good faith when she and the children remained in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:54 am
New Jersey, 2022) the principal contested issues were (1) whether Respondent had “wrongfully retained” A.L.S. and A.H.S. in New Jersey as of July 10, 2019 without Petitioner’s consent; (2) if she had, whether the United States or Belgium was the children’s “habitual residence” immediately prior to the date of wrongful retention; and (3) if the habitual residence was Belgium, whether Respondent had any affirmative defenses. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
The Court concluded that the Constitution’s Suspension Clause did not apply to the petitioner because the right he was seeking—to remain in the United States under the nation’s immigration laws—fell outside the historical core of the Suspension Clause, which was limited to challenging detention as such. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
United States, however, recognized an exception for cases in which a nonmember enters a contract or other consensual commercial relationship with a tribe or its members. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
Get Help with Your I-601 or I-601A Waiver If you’ve been found inadmissible to the United States and would like to apply for an I601 or I601A waiver, the experienced attorneys at Ranchod Law Group are here to help. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:04 am
United States, 21-2755(2d Cir. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
After they married, Petitioner continued living in Jamaica, and Respondent traveled back and forth between Jamaica and the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:33 am
How to Write an I601 Extreme Hardship Waiver Argument If you’ve been found inadmissible to the United States or to adjust your status due to certain immigration violations, you may be eligible to apply for an I601 Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:47 am
The topic of mergers between two business entities designed to involuntarily extinguish the equity interest of a minority owner in exchange for cash is one of our favorites on New York Business Divorce. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States of America, Respondents (2Cir Opinion)... [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982), the Supreme Court held that when an agency issues sequential decisions, reversal by a court of a later decision does not automatically reinstate an earlier one. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
Its Terms of Reference state: “There is a solemn duty on our whole United Kingdom to come together and mark this momentous and life-changing occurrence. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
United States, Dubin asks the justices to provide clarity on this issue, which he says has now split nine of the 13 circuit courts of appeals. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:53 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
