Search for: "US Fidelis, Inc"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 2:34 am
Consequently, the Panel finds that the Respondent and the registrant of the second domain name are using the disputed domain names in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy ¶ 4(c)(i). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
The dissent found that there was no confusing similarity between EDREAMS and and that the Respondent proved that it used the domain name for a bona fide offering of good or services. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
Vrvv Inc., D2009-1418 (WIPO January 4, 2010). [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
Domains By Proxy, Inc. / Rich Sanders and Octogen e-Solutions, D2009-0786 (WIPO August 19, 2009) (transfer granted). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Network, Inc., 105 F.3d 1361, 1364 (11th Cir.1997). [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:21 am
At its simplest a prima facie case requires the complainant to establish that in using the domain name the respondent is not making a bona fide offering of goods or services [paragraph 4(c)(ii)], is not commonly known by the domain name [paragraph 4(c)(ii)] and is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name or otherwise justified in using the domain name on free speech principles [paragraph 4(c)(iii)]. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:48 pm
In addition, please contact us directly to learn more about special free trial and payment options for mid-size and large law firms. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:41 am
The application was filed under Section 1(b) of the Lanham Act on the basis of a bone fide intent to use the mark in commerce. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:14 am
Does it, for example, use an algorithm to select the sequence of letters? [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:36 am
Use of a “disputed domain name to direct Internet users to other charitable organizations is not a bona fide offering of services,” Id. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 7:13 am
To this end, the Lanham Act requires an applicant to show “use in commerce,” which is “the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:22 am
Mylan, Inc., 2009 WL 4730820 (S.D.W. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:38 am
American Sports Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:38 am
Such reviews will focus, in particular, on whether the bidder's actions were based on a reasonable interpretation of bona fide conditions in its offer.In its review of relevant OSC decisions, the report highlights Re Hudbay Minerals Inc. and InterRent Real Estate Investment Trust, both decisions where the OSC was asked to review a TSX decision that approved the issuance of shares without shareholder approval. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:43 am
Persis International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
Pearle Vision Center, Inc. (1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 419, 426; see also Environmental Coalition of Orange County, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:05 pm
Epic Advertising, Inc., 2:09-cv-01043-PMW (D. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
But that is not the meaning of the provision before us. [read post]
