Search for: "US v. Jones"
Results 861 - 880
of 5,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Jones, 2017 SCC 60, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 696 at para. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:25 am
Requiring a lifeguard applicant to take a swim test using a State issued “Speedo” swimsuit is not an act of unlawful discrimination because of ageMatter of Lester v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 60 AD3d 680The New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Roy J. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:18 pm
In Holland v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:24 pm
In Village Heights Condominium Association v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:39 am
Per U.S. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:24 pm
The new decision in Prince Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:41 am
Although Jones was a major victory for privacy, it also left a host of unanswered questions about the proper use of surveillance technologies going forward. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:40 pm
We should even be willing to offer our assistance when it comes at some cost to us. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:49 pm
Jones & Sarah F. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm
Kristen Larson and Regina Keenan In Tracey v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:09 am
Yesterday's US Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:31 am
Using last Wednesday's Buck v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:12 pm
Jones. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
Jones, Burg, Eldredge, Hersh & Jardine, PC, Cody, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Hot Springs DFS: Bruce A. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
This was the question put squarely to the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Mackie 2014 ABCA 221. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), the use of the RoundUp program constituted a physical trespass of Brashear's `effect’ -- the computer -- and was therefore an unreasonable search. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:01 pm
From Morland-Jones v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
Jones (her real name) and Mr. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:46 am
" Failure to allow this evidence can result in reversible error, as the Court of Appeals of South Carolina held in State v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
In circuits that had allowed warrantless GPS prior to Jones, courts have been allowing the use of GPS data obtained prior to Jones (see previous post here). [read post]
