Search for: "United States v. Clark" Results 861 - 880 of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am by Anushka Limaye
Victoria Clark posted their joint statement. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
PUTTING THE WAR IN CYBERWAR: METAPHOR, ANALOGY, AND CYBERSECURITY DISCOURSE IN THE UNITED STATES Sean Lawson First Monday, Volume 17, Number 7 – 2 July 2012 [
Footnotes omitted; they are available in the original via the hyperlink above. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
  Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm by charonqc
But, Winston Churchill envisaged the United States of Europe. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Oct. 14, 2008) (reducing punitive damages award to comply with due process requirements of the United States Constitution); Anderson v. [read post]