Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 861 - 880 of 1,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2016, 2:04 pm
United States, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 789, low flying Navy planes near Hackensack, Minnesota frightened plaintiff's minks, causing the mothers to kill their kits. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Associated Press, Jessica Gresko looks at Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
 The United States filed its opposition on June 5, 2015. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Unlike every other court ruling — federal or state — since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:59 pm by Hannah Zhao
We have documented more than 1,471 law enforcement agencies across the United States that operate drones. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
United States and California (Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00167) (previous HL Pulse discussion here). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 11:04 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation et al v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 5:13 pm by Rich Cassidy
The town hall style program was conducted to inform the bar and policy makers of  the implications of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]