Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 861 - 880 of 940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:43 am by Randy Barnett
In the wake of Marshall’s capacious 1819 opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
13 May 2022, 7:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Polo Ass'n: Gaebel is a 73-year-old retired United States Naval Commander and a senior level executive with a federal government contractor. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Leland E. Beck
Sidebar:  The law presumes constructive knowledge of the law’s content by publication, whether the United States Code and Code of Federal Regulations. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 am
A ruling Wednesday by a judge granting the defense judgment NOV in Nelson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Fernandez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and to pay and receive illegal health care kickbacks. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm by lawmrh
Constitution, “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:50 am by SHG
Via Eugene Volokh at WaPo Conspiracy, the 9th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am by Kara OBrien
In March, a Massachusetts federal district court ruled in Lawson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Nelson, 405 F.2d 872, 873 (9th Cir. 1968) (affirming dismissal of “a series of broad conclusory statements unsupported, for the most part, by specific allegations of fact”). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]