Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 861 - 880
of 4,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
PSKS, Inc.) and, of course, campaign finance (Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Although Justice Kennedy initially questioned plaintiffs’ attorney, Paul Hoffman, about the consequences of applying the ATS outside of the United States, the Court’s liberal justices asked the most probing questions posed during the argument. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
In Metrish v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
By the end of 2008, approximately 32,000 same-sex couples had married in the United States, and 80,000 more were domestic partners, reciprocal beneficiaries, or united in civil unions. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:53 am
PAUL TRAVELERS COS., INC., Defendant. 07 Civ. 5459 (WHP) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2007 U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
The Consent Decree is the subject of another case in this District, United States of America v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court [See WIMS 3/21/13]. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case: United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:07 am
United States, No. 1:04-cr-00371 (N.D. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:28 am
Recently this issue has come to a head in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, In re Amy Unknown, No. 09-41238, and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC’s Allegations The FTC alleges that the proposed acquisition would violate the law in several ways: (i) it would result in the elimination of significant head-to-head competition between the handbag brands; (ii) it would significantly increase concentration in an alleged market for “accessible luxury” handbags in the United States; (iii) it would result in significant effects on the wages, benefits and working conditions of employees of the merging parties;… [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:21 pm
”[14] In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
& Alkermes Pharma Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
The American Constitution Society interviewed Paul Smith, counsel for the plaintiffs in the landmark Court case Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:08 pm
§ 101 The United States Supreme Court issued a significant, unanimous decision yesterday in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
United States, 315 U. [read post]
