Search for: "United States v. Powers"
Results 861 - 880
of 20,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 3:25 pm
In light of that exchange, I thought I might point out that today, in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:32 am
What's the upshot for Section Three and Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:17 am
Reeves on the United States District Court. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
” The wrong turn came in the next case, Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
These votes seem much more aligned with the Republican Party’s desire to make it harder for people of color to vote than any reasonable interpretation of the United States Constitution.There is an aspect of equal protection clause doctrine that prohibits states from conditioning the exercise of fundamental rights on payments that the poor cannot afford. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities – from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The SEMA thus grants the executive branch broad powers. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Laura Kalman is undoubtedly correct to note in her contribution that Taft was a wretched president, but she understates the extent to which he was an innovative and powerful advocate for reforming essential presidential powers, like the system of executive budgeting which we today take for granted. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:27 pm
As the United States Supreme Court articulated in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
ALEC also has taken strides in coopting progressives seeking an Article V convention to reverse Citizens United. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]