Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:27 am
Let’s review an Illinois case from a few years back, United Stationers Supply Co v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:05 am
Rev. 21.Caffrey, Denise, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
”The President, with the State Budget Director's approval, then adopted a Regulation that reduced the State's contribution for health insurance premiums not only for employees in State’s several negotiating units that had agreed to the reductions through collective bargaining, but also for some “nonunionized employees” and retirees of the State as the employer. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am
Make whole any unit employees who retired during or after August 2011 and who have been required to contribute towards the cost of health insurance.* In Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313, the court held that health insurance was not a retirement benefit within the meaning of Article 5, Section 7, of the State Constitution.. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
Supreme Court decision Taylor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:04 pm
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 413 (2000).Under the "unreasonable application" clause, a federal habeas court may grant the writ if the state court identifies the correct governing legal principle from this Court's decisions but unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of the prisoner's case.Unfortunately, an otherwise good Fourth Circuit opinion, Green v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
More to come.......5) United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:39 am
CanadaCharter of Rights and Freedoms: Andrew Wakeling is wanted in the United States for drug charges. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2014); United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
No private right of action flows from a mere statement of general policy applicable to all Civil Service employeesMatter of Subway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Taylor, Wendy Puriefoy, Richard D. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
Taylor Borzu Sabahi & Kabir Duggal, Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
” In Taylor v. [read post]
