Search for: "United States v. Terry" Results 861 - 880 of 1,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am by WSLL
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
” The foreign government must have adopted “procedures to minimize the acquisition, retention and dissemination of information concerning United States persons subject to the agreement. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am by Florian Mueller
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s an excerpt: The Second Circuit ruled on August 24 in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am by SHG
CERTIORARI DENIED… 13-1012 VANGELDER, TERRY V. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm by cdw
Australia refuses to extradite to Alabama  Gabe Watson as Alabama will not waive the death penalty and the Aussies will not extradite to the United States if the death penalty is a potential punishment. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In the United States at the end of the millennium, even liberals with gay friends viewed the social group through the lens of sexuality. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Richard Renner
On page 18, Boeing's brief cites to Terry Morehead Dworkin, SOX and Whistleblowing, 105 Mich. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am by Michael O'Brien
 This blog has previously explained how social insurance works in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm by Schachtman
We are getting close to a quarter of a century since the United States Supreme Court outlined the requirements of gatekeeping, in Daubert v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom ([2001] 2 FLR 261) that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions. [read post]