Search for: "W. T. SMITH"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 7:55 am
” Working with Karl Rove, today a chief strategist for President George W. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
JAMES W. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(Docket Report) District Court W D Tennessee: Twombly and Iqbal, not Form 18, dictate pleading standard for indirect infringement: Asentinel LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
(China LawBlog) Ethiopia A to Z of African official IP websites no.19: Ethiopia (Afro-IP) Europe OHIM’s new mediation service: in force since 24 October 2011 (Class 46) Child’s-play for CJEU as Spanish pogs pip Pepsi’s: PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, OHIM (IPKat) General Court finds overall similarity between SEVEN and SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND marks: Case T-176/10 (Class 46) General Court confirmed that Soviet Coat of Arms cannot be registered as a CTM:… [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
Best W. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 10:32 pm
[4] Bradford W. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:43 pm
[Read the full article at Forbes.com, here] Posted by: Andrew W. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:26 am
Usher Edited by Niamh Nic Shuibhne and Laurence W. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
Smith cited “the lack of certainty of the pathologic diagnosis of ovarian cancer versus a peritoneal mesothelioma in epidemiologic studies” as making the epidemiology uninterpretable and any conclusions impossible.[14] Against this backdrop of evidence, I took a look at what Johnson & Johnson had to say about the occupational asbestos epidemiology in its briefs, in section “B. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Hobby Lobby has made a very general allegation (paragraph 139 of its complaint) that “[t]he Mandate places Plaintiffs at a competitive disadvantage in its efforts to recruit and retain employees”; but the plaintiffs have not alleged any facts to explain why that is so, to demonstrate to what extent such a disadvantage would be a function of federal law (as opposed to the competitive dynamics markets involving other private actors), or to show that such a competitive… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 2000 WL 1294324, at *3 (Tenn. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:26 am
“[W]hen Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
Clarke, W. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
“Per our rules, we can’t do so today—wish we could—but we will endeavor to do so in the very near future. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
Smith and visiting Judge Siler. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am
Co-authored by: Jeremy W. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 6:49 am
Netessine opts for the latter— …[W]hen people search for what to watch in this increasing product variety, they tend to gravitate much more towards hits. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:00 am
William W. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Smith, 110 N.C. [read post]
