Search for: "Wilson v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm
The question in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:28 am
United States, 553 U.S. 137, 128 S. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:09 pm
In Wilson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
There was a report of the settlement in Horse & Hound and on the Brett Wilson website. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:03 am
United States, No. 12-15424. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:24 am
Other than our state attorney general, Alan Wilson, few attorneys believe Judge Childs won’t be compelled by Bostic v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 12:30 pm
Put an express provision in the deal that says that even though you agree to recommend a six-month sentence, "nothing herein shall prevent or in any way preclude the United States from introducing in the district court the criminal history of the defendant, including the details of these offenses, and/or supplementing the PSR to including additional facts regarding defendant's prior convictions. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
The court concluded that defendant had never establish that the learned treatise was a “reliable authority” as required under Wilson vs Clark. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
It looks like USA v. [read post]
