Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 208,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision Liu v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
In Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:57 pm
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
Holder v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:46 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0048, 2011 MT 265, JEFFERSON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Montana, by and through its Board of Commissioners, Petitioner and Appellee, v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
In Osborn v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:59 pm
Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals Industrial Co., where after extensive proceedings in state and federal courts, including the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:39 pm
Last fall the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm
On October 5, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inOBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am
Supreme Court decision in Gant v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
The State petitioned for discretionary review. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. [read post]
13 Jun 2025, 8:08 am
In a decision with major implications for public- and private-sector employers alike, the Supreme Court of Canada has declined to hear the Township of Ignace’s appeal in Dufault v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Ricci v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
By Jay Levine and Darcy Jalandoni This podcast discusses the background and potential legal implications, particularly on state licensing boards, of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
United States and Rita v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:31 am
The court further held that ICWA violated the Tenth Amendment’s prohibition on commandeering state legislative functions. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]
