Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 21,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[The court also drops a footnote noting that even though the defendant may not be liable under section 502, the defendant may still be liable for breach of contract. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:21 pm
Should the officers be liable for entering the house with a warrant not based on probable cause? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm
Bui and Saylor are liable for violating Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:19 pm
The trial judge ruled that the driver was an independent contractor and, based on that status, the broker and the service couldn’t be liable for the driver’s negligence. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Here, the district court said this meant the estate could not be dismissed as a defendant because there was no way to determine the employer’s liability without also determining the employee’s. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
Similarly, SEC disgorgement fails to take into account a defendant’s expenses which may reduce the amount of illegal profit. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
However, even if a defendant does not itself copy the material, a defendant may be found liable for "contributory infringement" where it "with knowledge of the infringing activity, induces, causes or materially contributes to the infringing conduct of another. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
The Court finds defendant's argument persuasive. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:48 pm
Lastly, let’s spend a moment on the Defendant’s dad. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 9:05 pm
The LVT was not required to sit in silence and find the applicants liable for service charges when the LVT had good reason to query as to whether the charges were legally due. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm
Of details A defendant is liable for “induced infringement under § 271(b)” if the defendant took certain affirmative acts to bring about the commission by others of acts of infringement and had “knowledge that the induced acts constitute patent infringement. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
Culinary Inst. of Am., the question was whether a driver’s employer could be held liable for injuries caused by an employee who ran over two pedestrians. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
The court granted plaintiff’s motion. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Defendants claimed that the investigator’s report and declaration should be inadmissible as he was not an expert witness. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:53 am
Eady J, sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division, dismissed the plaintiff’s claims against Google on the grounds that Google did not publish the material. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm
See Id. at *6 (“Defendants breached their duty by . . . putting [the drug] on the market in 1996, when [they] knew [it] was unreasonably dangerous”) (quoting complaint); (“claims regarding [defendant’s] acts and omissions, prior to the FDA’s approval, in bringing the drug to market”) (court’s characterization).Note that plaintiff did not, and could not, allege that the defendants withheld… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:01 pm
Chandler Services Inc., Williams Machine and Tool Co., and Groen’s Towing and Truck Repair and Buyers Products Co are the other defendants named in this Blue Island wrongful death case. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
Miranda-Marin, No. 08-2319 In a municipal employee's suit claiming that she was transferred to another position in retaliation for testimony she gave before the Puerto Rico Government Ethics Office in violation of her rights under the First Amendment and Puerto Rico law, judgment of the district court is affirmed where: 1) the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to support a jury finding that plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action sufficient to support her section 1983… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:32 am
Usually this is a defense used by the insurance carrier defending a company which is trying to avoid paying the claim. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:27 am
In the end, the jury determined that the doctor’s damages were $10 million and that the hospital was 70% liable for the doctor’s injuries and the doctor 30% liable. [read post]
