Search for: "Individual Does 1-10" Results 8801 - 8820 of 14,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 11:10 am by Eric Goldman
C-131/12 (2014), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) reached four important conclusions. 1) Privacy Directive Applies. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am by Bruce Colbath
 D-5-MTHF does not occur in nature and does not have the same nutritional benefits to humans as Merck’s L-5-MTHF product. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am by Bruce Colbath
 D-5-MTHF does not occur in nature and does not have the same nutritional benefits to humans as Merck’s L-5-MTHF product. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:50 pm
, but here’s my tentative thinking: 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
June 10, 2014) (holding that an online service provider “may not invoke the safe harbor found in Section 512(c)(1) with respect to infringing conduct that occurred prior to . . . designating a DMCA-related agent with the Copyright Office”); Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
They are also eligible for work authorization, but deferred action is not a lawful status nor does it lead to a lawful permanent status. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
The rights are really communally derived, but they’re vested in the individual, they reside in the individual, and that sets up the relation between the individual and the state. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
 The President, who has been unsuccessful in urging Congress to reduce that tax rate to 10%, simply announces that he has instructed the IRS not to tax gains in excess of the 10% rate. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The husband failed to demonstrate that he contributed $1 million or more in separate property to their individual acquisition. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:54 am by Katitza Rodriguez
An Argentine regulation there had compelled all telcos and ISPs to record, index, and store traffic data for a 10-year period. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
  The Court noted that, while predominance “requires a determination that group, rather than individual, issues predominate,” that does not “preclude the consideration of individual issues at trial when those issues legitimately touch upon relevant aspects of the case being litigated. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm by Ronald Meisburg
 Since it does not pertain to employees’ discussion wages or terms and conditions of employment, it does not unlawfully restrict Section 7 rights. [read post]