Search for: "S. C." Results 8801 - 8820 of 142,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
En conséquence, Huawei s'est engagée à délivrer des licences à des conditions FRAND (équitables, raisonnables et non-discriminatoires). [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 2:32 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
From the nursery to the nursing home ‘everyday politics’ improves people’s lives. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:44 pm by Sutherland LNG
The recent announcement of Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s (Shell) C$88 billion ($70 billion) deal to buy BG Group PLC (BG Group) could mean the end of BG Group’s proposed Prince Rupert LNG export terminal project in British Columbia (B.C.). [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 6:36 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- finding that agency properly withheld certain records from plaintiff's inmate files pursuant to Exemptions 5, 6, 7(C), 7(E), and 7(F), and that agency's delayed releases of records did not preclude summary judgment. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:29 pm by Howard Friedman
Initially the Gunkle's had created a 501(c)(3) non-profit, City of Refuge Christian Fellowship, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Degeling, Simone and Hudson, Jessica and Samet, Irit, a volume in the Oxford University Press's series, Philosophical Foundations of Law,This chapter discusses the historical and analytical conceptions of the express trust in the period c 1600 – 1900. [read post]
19 May 2020, 12:42 pm
  references to matters outside the appellate record violate at least two Rules: (1) Rule 8.204(a)(1)(C), which provides that each brief must "[s]upport any reference to a matter in the record," and (2) Rule 8.204(a)(2)(C), which provides that the opening brief must "[p]rovide a summary of the significant facts limited to matters in the record. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 7:22 am by Allan Blutstein
Mo.) -- ruling that: (1) DOJ properly declined to search for third-party records in absence of subject’s written consent or proof of his death because records were protected by Exemptions 6 and 7(C), and plaintiff failed to demonstrate that public interest in disclosure outweighed subject’s privacy interests; (2) even if Exemptions 6 and 7(C) did not apply, requested records were protected as privileged under Exemption 4. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 6:46 pm by Patent Docs
Michael Carroll, American University Washington College of Law, with a panel including Erik C. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:08 am by Eric Goldman
Second, the amended language expresses the court’s holding exceptionally clearly: “blocking and filtering decisions that are driven by anticompetitive animus are not entitled to immunity under section 230(c)(2). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:59 am by Cynthia Larose
  Ottawa’s new Bill C-28– known as “CASL” and expected to be finalized early in 2013 — has severe fines for violations and is viewed by many as too tough. [read post]