Search for: "State v. James" Results 8801 - 8820 of 9,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Patrick C. Toomey
Former intelligence officials, including George Croner and James Petrila in their recent piece, describe Section 702 surveillance as a tool used to monitor foreign targets with limited impact on Americans. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Perhaps he is reluctant to embrace the Wilsonian view for the reasons stated above. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Joseph Margulies
His successor, James Clapper, said in 2011 that while terrorism “will remain at the forefront of our national security threats,” al-Qaeda “continues to be damaged” by U.S. counterterrorism efforts. [read post]
Several contributors to the book, led by James Greiner and Renee Danser from Harvard Law, surveyed the existing social science literature on virtual interaction in both law and non-law contexts. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:08 am by Rebecca Ingber
As for whether the predicate “invasion … against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government” has been met, Judge Boasberg put forward a framework for how he would consider the question on the merits, pointing to prior cases like Hamdi v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
”5 The site’s “Facebook Principles” state that a user may “set up a personal profile, form relationships, perform searches and queries, form groups, set up events, add applications and transmit information through various channels. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]