Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 45,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
The Mag-Lite trademark was registered with the United States Patent Trademark Office in 1979. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:20 am
Indeed, the facts of a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Pettit v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
In Desrosiers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
The majority opinion noted the 2012 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
United States Telecom Ass'n v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
For example, Commissioner Kappos recently discussed an IDS which was 1000 pages long. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] DigiProtect USA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On12 June 2024 the Supreme Court handed down the long-awaited judgement in the case of George v Cannell [2024] UKSC 19. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
”), and State v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am
” “Galderma had asked V&E to withdraw, but it refused, citing a conflicts waiver that was part of the engagement letter Galderma had signed. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:03 pm
But this post will end our obsessive constant coverage of the strange and sad case of United States v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:38 pm
State. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:27 pm
It is difficult to know whether they were persuaded by the fact that many states have long followed the rule that if a lab analyst’s report is admitted that analyst must testify in court, absent stipulation, and these states have not faced intolerable difficulties. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
Torres v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Gomez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
On June 17, 2008, the long awaited opinion from the New Jersey Supreme Court in the case of Devaney v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
SEC (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring); see also United States v. [read post]