Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 55,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2022, 7:46 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:12 am
Thanks to Tracy v Solesky, the fact that pit bulls are dangerous is not only a foregone conclusion, but it’s also a point of law. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The appellant-defendant in the case is represented by the Michigan Innocence Project, run out of the UM Law School by Professor David Moran.The case, People vs Likine, was the subject of a one-day jury trial in the Oakland County Circuit Court back in November 2008. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:58 am
“Since the Supreme Court decided Estate of Thornton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:30 am
Capers provides a criminal law lens for family law scholars to further examine and understand the landmark decision, Loving v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
This year, the preview for Madison v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:11 am
See Creazzo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:18 pm
In Bentley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
From Smiley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
The assumption is that defense counsel made a strategic choice not to raise repugnance, to avoid the remedy.Finally, repugnance is not tested by referring to what the law actually requires, it is tested by referring to the law as it was given to this jury, even if the charge was erroneous (People v Green, 71 NY2d 1006 [1988]). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 3:06 am
These are smart people. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
White warned against unsupervised use of government power to spy on the people. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:02 am
Gregory Ablavsky has posted “Upper Skagit v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 8:55 am
Catalano, Jr. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 6:11 am
Because disqualification is not mandatory here, the judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]) even if a party objects to the judge’s participation. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:42 am
The California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:09 am
I will be on a panel devoted to teaching the most challenging civ pro cases, talking about Gasperini v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:50 pm
Supreme Court decided Negusie v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
Executive Summary The Section welcomes these interpretive provisions for the better administration of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “Company Law”). [read post]
