Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 8801 - 8820 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
Cash Biz .Also see --> Amicus Curiae Brief by Texas Appleseed in payday lender arbitration case in support of Petitioners (Borrowers)TEXAS SUPREME COURT OPINION IN HENRY V. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am by Lisa McElroy
United States, the Court had the opportunity to clarify the Armed Career Criminal Act (the “ACCA”), the federal government’s version of a “three strikes” law. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“Second, the petitioner must satisfy ‘theburden of showing that his right to issuance of the writ isclear and indisputable. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
She stated, however, that because she was not required to do so by the Family Code at this time that she was declining to provide any values for now. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Schiro No. 18-0278 (Tex. 2019) (attorney fee award based on fee-shifting statute reversed and remanded for redetermination).Cognate Place Name   ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Hispanic National Bar Association, National Asian Pacific American Bar Association, National Bar Association ("the nation's oldest and largest national network of predominantly African-American attorneys and judges in the United States"), National LGBT Bar Association, and National Native American Bar Association as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner—groups that few would call racist or racially insensitive. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am by Miriam Seifter
 All agree, the Court says, that under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
This has been suggested by the United Church of Canada, together with such organizations as the Catholic Women’s League of Canada. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Distortions/falsehoods about White House officials’ statements The US Solicitor General, in a brief filed earlier this month, shows that many of the petitioners’ facts are flimsy or drawn from statements that are taken out of context. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm by Steven Kaufhold
” Arguing on behalf of the United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General told the Court that Section 16(b) looks “for all intents and purposes like an ordinary statute of limitations” and should be subject to equitable tolling. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 am by Legal Beagle
Since 2001, and despite the then Justice Minister Jim Wallace promising to investigate this, nothing has been done.In fact it is worse than that and having gone through the motions of examining my petition (PE 1073 Link) on this subject—which also included the equally disproportionate number of Muslims in Scottish prisons—the Scottish Parliament has decided to take no action on this shameful reflection on the Scottish justice system.The highly-respected Ulsterman, Kenny Shiels, the… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (CA5 2013) (federal employee's RFRA claim could proceed even though de minimis standard foreclosed Title VII claim). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:12 am by Matt Osenga
United States Brief The Solicitor began the brief by arguing that § 282? [read post]