Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 8821 - 8840 of 88,756
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm by Aaron Moss
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm by James Romoser
In his majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
I also had some related and more wide-ranging discussion of the Court (and the state of our institutions more generally) with Bill Kristol on his show, Conversations with Kristol. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
The other problem is that its decision in Dobbs reversing Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm by Florian Mueller
Some of what is going on has the potential for meteoric impact:If Epic Games' Ninth Circuit appeal succeeded (as I believe it should), Apple could still seek some fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) compensation for the use of its intellectual property, but that would be very little compared to what they're charging now.In Europe, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) takes some time to roll out and will invite legal challenges, but it's going to happen.There is still… [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:52 am by SHG
Several weeks ago, the litigant filed Doe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
They assembled an excellent panel for the seminar including Magistrate Jacquelin V. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Volokh has no legal authority or any right to void those court orders by publishing my identify and the case information all together. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm by Anthony Zaller
If the employer fails to provide notice regarding a relocation of its call center, the employer will be ineligible to be awarded or have renewed state grants or state-guaranteed loans for 5 years. [read post]
Article 62 of the ICJ Statute stipulates that a state may request to intervene in a contentious case if it “consider[s] that it has an interest of a legal nature which may be affected by the decision in the case. [read post]