Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8821 - 8840
of 16,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 6:39 am
Taft Stettinius & Hollister would represent the city, with the contract stating no more than $40,000 would be spent on this matter and an unrelated matter. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:19 am
No matter. [read post]
16 May 2021, 6:25 pm
“It wasn’t the most numerous, but it was the most prosperous. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:12 am
[T]he New York Court of Appeals has not adopted it . . . and plaintiff cannot even cite an Appellate Division decision adopting the section. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:44 pm
We would like that this resolution marks the anniversary of our presence in the European Union. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
Many opponents’ counsel have been inserting claims to this effect in statements of opposition for years, if not decades, almost as a matter of course. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:43 am
It really doesn't matter why. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Mark B. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
Colting (IP Watch) Don’t let ASCAP’s president be silenced (Creative [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
For example, I used to mark up every aspect of a client’s contract. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
This may not be what Slate writer Mark Joseph Stern wants to hear, but the world doesn’t know these lawyers exist, and, frankly couldn’t care less. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:14 am
Don’t assume that issues that matter to one corporate employee matter to others or that things you say to one person are automatically shared with others. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 6:26 am
Don’t settle for less! [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
For example, I used to mark up every aspect of a client’s contract. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 12:56 pm
But for the reasons stated in my earlier critique of Ignatius’ view, I wouldn’t want to start from that position as a matter of strategy. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
at 4.The “reasonably foreseeable” incitement rationale for truthful off-label promotion supposedly creating “false” claims can’t fly because foreseeability isn’t enough for “incitement” – the unlawful conduct must be “imminent. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:39 pm
Will having five different employers in a 10-year period be a black mark on an application? [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
DRAFTING, INTERPRETING, AND APPLYING LEGISLATION Authors: John Mark Keyes; Wendy Gordon Editor: Gregory Tardi Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
"[155] Similarly, in Rumsfeld, the Court didn't view the aggregate of all the recruiting on the law school campus as a coherent speech product the way a parade might be. [read post]
2 May 2008, 5:59 pm
No matter what John Wash or Mark Foley say!!! [read post]
