Search for: "State v. Dollar" Results 8821 - 8840 of 9,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2006, 7:15 pm
The framers certainly could not have foreseen the development of a state so well funded (through the income tax) that representatives could try to ensure their reelection through the earmarking of millions of dollars to their districts. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am by Paul
The most notable example of ambush marketing occurred at the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta, when a sportswear company avoided paying a multi-million dollar sponsorship fee, but successfully mounted a marketing campaign by plastering the city in billboards, handing out free banners to spectators and erecting an entertainment centre in its own name overlooking the stadium. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
”  That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am by Paul Jacobson
In the context of “informational editorial use” (the appropriate category given the report’s nature), the guidelines state that “any legitimate editorial use does NOT create an Unauthorised Association” with FIFA™’s trade marks. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm by Paul
The most notable example of ambush marketing occurred at the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta, when a sportswear company avoided paying a multi-million dollar sponsorship fee, but successfully mounted a marketing campaign by plastering the city in billboards, handing out free banners to spectators and erecting an entertainment centre in its own name overlooking the stadium. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Dirk Auer
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:07 am by Kelly Faglioni and Jonathan L. Caulder
The longstanding frozen peas insurance coverage dispute in National Frozen Foods Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s February 21, 2018 decision in the Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:05 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Not surprising, given that the Supreme Court has not been able to settle on hard core doctrine, and even now -- some 80+ years since the modern recognition of the doctrine in Pennsylvania Coal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am by rainey Reitman
  Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
  A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:53 am by Robert Weed
That brings is to another Supreme Court decision, called Milavetz v United States. [read post]