Search for: "art@law" Results 8821 - 8840 of 39,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 6:02 am by Chris Castle
We also are pleased that the proposals recognize the critical need for substantial due process safeguards and the central role of federal law enforcement. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:34 am by R. David Donoghue
But the Court held that the Federal Circuit's constructions were the law of the case and were binding upon the parties. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:02 am by Chris Castle
We also are pleased that the proposals recognize the critical need for substantial due process safeguards and the central role of federal law enforcement. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:17 pm by John McKiggan
Recreational and Sports Organizations Will Have to Be Careful I am not aware of any equivalent case law in Nova Scotia and this case appears to be the first of its kind in Canada. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:14 am by Evan Schaeffer
(Meanwhile, I'm still searching for an explanation as to why I went to law school . . . ) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:35 pm by Tom Smith
But judges are regularly obliged to take on these questions—and their answers have huge consequences for what can and cannot be attempted by artists. via online.wsj.com This reminds me of a story I heard about a law firm whose office in DC was famous for its collection of modern art. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 9:12 am
(That means art found in a Linux distribution may not help, seeing as how Linus Torvalds first began the Linux kernel in 1991.)Red Hat has invited the community to join in the fight against the patent trolls by identifying prior art. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
  For more information about Michigan car accident cases, visit our law firm web site at www.BuckfireLaw.com. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
Lady Hale referred the following three questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling: (1) Is a child who is in the permanent legal guardianship of a Union citizen or citizens, under “kefalah” or some equivalent arrangement provided for in the law of his or her country of origin, a “direct descendant” within the meaning of Directive 2004/38, art 2.2(c)? [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:23 pm
Matthew John Duane (Michigan State University - College of Law) has posted Lending a Hand: The Need for Public Participation in Patent Examination and Beyond on SSRN. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:15 pm by Alfred Brophy
  But it seems apt -- that in the 1960s things that had been commonplace became art, just as doctrine emerged in constitutional law that was taken as commonplace. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
" He acknowledged that his description of a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) does not necessarily conflict with other Federal Circuit cases that described a PHOSITA as having "common sense" and who could find motivation "implicitly in the prior art. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Course starts March 20, 2012 Law School for Visual Artists Topics that will be covered during the 5-week course: Tuesday March 20, 2012 Introduction: • Legal Hypothetical: Analyzing legal issues in your art projects Tuesday March 27, 2012 • Basic business models (non-profit and for-profit corporations, LLC’s) • Fiscal Sponsorships • Employment issues A. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 2:17 pm by Ray Dowd
DowdOctober 22, 2012 6:00 pm – 9:00 pm The Green Room, San Francisco War Memorial Peforming Arts Center401 Van Ness Avenue, San FranciscoMr. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by Sheri Abrams
– Blindness, baseball SHOOTING BEAUTY – multiple disabilities in adults and art CROOKED BEAUTY – manic depression and art PRAYING WITH LIOR – Down syndrome, spirituality, Judaism, family relationship SHAMELESS – multiple disabilities including mental illness and art AMONG THE GIANTS – adaptive design ZIG ZAG LOVE – Cerebral Palsy, teen love, coming of age w/ disability, family relationships WAR EAGLE – Cerebral Palsy, speech… [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
However in the present case the appropriate court to consider the issues is the High Court as the contractual questions raised are governed by English law. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 4:47 am by The Docket Navigator
It never occurred to me that patent law trumped the Federal Rules of Evidence on the issue of obviousness. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:40 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The admitted negligence of the respondent in its treatment should not be assimilated to the line of case law pertaining to negligent hospital treatment (in which case there would be no duty under article 2). [read post]