Search for: "Doe, Inc."
Results 8841 - 8860
of 51,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 12:40 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court Appeals, in Retail Ventures, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
Novell, Inc., No. 10-4122 (10th Cir. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:03 am
Earlier this week, the National Labor Relations Board issued a press release announcing the settlement of the NLRB’s Complaint against American Medical Response of Connecticut, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:39 pm
Texas Instruments, Inc., C.A. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 12:50 pm
Cellzdirect, Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:52 am
G-K-G, Inc., 39 F.3d 740, 747–748 (7th Cir. 1994); Lessard, 307 F.3d at 1027. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 6:45 am
Apotex Inc., 2:02-cv-02255. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 1:08 pm
On September 25, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that Biglari Holdings, Inc., which owns Steak ‘n Shake and Western Sizzlin restaurant chains, agreed to pay $850,000 in civil penalties to resolve allegations that it failed to make a premerger notification filing in connection with its acquisition of 8.7% of the outstanding voting securities of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 8:36 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm
" DOE also finalized a partial guarantee for up to a $350 million loan to support a geothermal power generation project sponsored by Ormat Nevada, Inc., which is expected to produce up to 113 megawatts (MW) of clean, baseload power from three geothermal power facilities and will increase geothermal power production in Nevada by nearly 25 percent. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Kaloti Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 8:52 am
" Card Activation Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2017, 10:11 am
(“Breckenridge”)does not directly infringe or induce infringement ofthe asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 8:33 am
The New Food Guy, Inc., a unanimous Tenth Circuit panel (decided by two judges instead of three due to Justice Gorsuch’s ascension) held that an employer that pays its employees at least minimum wage does not violate the FLSA by retaining customer tips. [read post]
26 May 2016, 8:45 am
§ 42.123] . . . that does not, itself, guarantee that the motion will be granted,” and § 42.123(a) does not offer “a routine avenue for bolstering deficiencies in a petition raised by a patent owner in a preliminary response” or “a ‘wait-and-see’ opportunity to supplement a petition after initial comments or arguments have been laid out by a patent owner. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:08 pm
That does not appear to be the case. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
" Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:40 am
I have finally finished reading SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd (the IPKat beat me to it). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:06 pm
Enbridge Energy Company, Inc., C.A. [read post]
