Search for: "People v. Herring" Results 8841 - 8860 of 23,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2022, 10:54 am by Georgialee Lang
A six-year old indigenous girl was the focus of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in ML v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:08 pm
McCorvey is better known as Jane Roe, of Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
(Wait – why do people tune in?) [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
  So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:18 am by Christopher Spizzirri
Recently, Vice Chancellor Laster gave some of us a jolt with a bench ruling on a discovery dispute in Roffe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
And when the people speak, the Court listens. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Broadly speaking, ARTs have made it possible for people to create and expand their families where this was previously not possible. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
Among the things NAPABA gets right is the use of video to draw people in. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am by Tejinder Singh
Interestingly, Justice Sotomayor also jumped in to say that the Court could accept Carvin’s representation that there is standing, thus suggesting her desire to reach the merits. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
As well as what we should expect.Beyond this larger point, I did want to make one other particularized critique of Judge Smith's view -- or, perhaps more accurately, of the FLSA (depending on whether or not you think that Judge Smith's done the right thing here, which I think most people would).Judge Smith's holding is based upon the intuition that since the nurses prefer this regime, and since it was done for their benefit, the FLSA time-and-a-half provisions shouldn't… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
The standards, set in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]