Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8841 - 8860 of 13,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
California Teachers Association 14-915Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court has now held - and the California Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal for the Second District have recognized - that a jury in an individual lawsuit may not impose punitive damages to punish conduct that did not harm the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:32 am by Guest Author
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court in 2006, held that public employee speech made pursuant to “official duties” does not have First Amendment protection, and cannot form the basis for a retaliation claim. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:56 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Northern District of California: U.S. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
California, 16-894, has been relisted a second time this week.) [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeffrey Bellin
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan endorsed this approach, noting that, in the 1991 decision California v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:44 am by Jamie Williams
”   Facebook also sued Power Ventures, arguing that it violated the CFAA, the corresponding state law in California (California Penal Code § 502), and the CAN-SPAM Act—the federal law that prohibits sending commercial emails with “materially misleading” header information. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm by Kalvis Golde
City of Los Angeles, California 22-64Issues: (1) Whether Heck v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The exercise of this authority is fully consistent with the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Connecticut. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This issue came before the United States Supreme Court in the form of a submerged lands case from the State of Florida. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am by INFORRM
Former footballer, Joey Barton has made a statement in open court, in which he apologised for suggesting that Radio 2 presenter Jeremy Vine had a sexual interest in children in a series of online posts and stated that he recognised the allegations were untrue. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“SkinMedica”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granting Histogen, Inc., Histogen Aesthetics, and Gail Naughton (collectively “Histogen”) summary judgment of noninfringement of the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]