Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 8841 - 8860
of 28,747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2018, 9:16 am
Five States and the District of Columbia subsequently intervened in the new case. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The opinion also states that it is improper for a judge to utilize such research to corroborate or disprove adjudicative facts. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:57 pm
The specific case is Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:37 pm
” Palmisano, et al v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:37 pm
” Palmisano, et al v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
Failing to do so would breach the minimum level of protection guaranteed by the Rome Convention and the WPPT, leaving signatory states vulnerable to sanctions through the World Trade Organisation and/or the European Commission for non-compliance.A knock-on effectThe upshot of this interpretation is that for every new copyright work (capable of performance) recognized by national courts, new categories of protected performances will arise. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm
In the 16th Century Pope Sixtus V commissioned the architect Domenico Fontana to create new buildings to house the Vatican collections, and these are still used today. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
The second-ranked brief in the set was also from a state or local level attorney, Thomas Carpenter from the Office of the City Attorney in Little Rock, Ark., in the Wayfair case. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
On grounds 1 and 2, para 2.2.4 of the allocation policy stated: “Households who have not been continuously living in the borough for at least 10 years and will not qualify to join the housing register Applicants will need to demonstrate a local connection with Hillingdon. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:31 pm
Clark v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
The panel expressed its displeasure with the close-connection theory, stating that the RNC could not overcome this justification for the contribution limits “at least at the District Court level. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
United States (argued and briefed as Dalmazzi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:43 am
The clause should be read as a whole and its intention was to maintain the overall level of remuneration which the employee would have received if working. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
It’s a case called Minarsky v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
It’s a case called Minarsky v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:23 pm
§ 4058(a)(1); County of Kern v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:23 pm
§ 4058(a)(1); County of Kern v. [read post]
