Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 12,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
These subpoenas — born, one suspects, out of enmity for this president — implicate important issues of separation of powers and federalism, including: the legitimate scope of congressional oversight; the ability of a state prosecutor to investigate and possibly indict a sitting president; whether United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
That brings us to the new NC case, State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
S196568, and Wisdom v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
A post in April 2013 reported the judgment of the Inner House in Doogan & Anor v NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board [2013] ScotCS CSIH 36. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 11:12 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 10:08 am
Department of Justice attorneys have signed up for a job that requires zealously advocating for the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:31 pm
Witt v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:11 am
In brief: What the statistical analyses actually show is that (A) the odds of obtaining the reported results in any of the four states if the 2020 voting population had precisely the same Dem. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
’ United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm
X v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Supreme Court* Federal Appellate Court Decisions* State Roundup* Topical* Articles/Reports/Books* Foreign SpotlightTo begin, scan the link descriptions below and click.U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 (27 September 2011) ECtHR: UK housing law (old system) not discriminatory in excluding asylum seekers from priority need status. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
In the second post, the present position will be compared with the current state of the law in Germany, with some references to the law in the United States of America. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
’s Messenger program infringed asserted claims and infringement was wilful: Creative Internet Advertising v Yahoo! [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding out-of-state… [read post]
