Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 191,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Parker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
[This post has been updated.] [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Such cases have been a bugbear for the liberal civil-rights cause.... [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
In March I described the outcome of the InterDigital v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Addressing the merits of Plaintiff's appeal, the Appellate Division noted that "[t]he comptroller is charged with the responsibility of determining service credits for retirement purposes and [the] determination will be upheld if rational and supported by substantial evidence", citing Matter of Rispoli v DiNapoli, 180 AD3d 1127. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Addressing the merits of Plaintiff's appeal, the Appellate Division noted that "[t]he comptroller is charged with the responsibility of determining service credits for retirement purposes and [the] determination will be upheld if rational and supported by substantial evidence", citing Matter of Rispoli v DiNapoli, 180 AD3d 1127. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In response to a challenge of that determination, a New York County Supreme Court judge sided with the candidate.But on appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously reversed.Even though he had been “removed” prior to the end of his second term, the AD1 was of the view that King was deemed to have served the full (second) term and was term-limited out; thus ineligible to run again.Ironically, the AD1 voted against him ….# # #DECISIONMatter of King… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Although the amounts that individuals spend on Bencher election campaigns vary considerably and there are no disclosure requirements, it has been anecdotally and repeatedly reported that it is not uncommon for some candidates to spend over $50,000 on their campaigns (see, here and here, for example). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:05 am
Albert v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:30 am
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Anne K. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax Disputes & Investigations team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd [2023] UKSC 17, which was handed down on 17 May 2023. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
This worst case scenario is not the end of the road – it has happened in the past, for instance with the National Gambling Amendment Bill [B27B-2018], that a lapsed Bill has been revived by the National Assembly (only to be rejected again by the NCOP, but that’s a story for another post). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Wainwright and Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:30 pm
Healy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
Gonzalez and Twitter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:36 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:41 pm
., v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:41 pm
Second, the Board, citing WBIP, LLC v. [read post]
