Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 8861 - 8880 of 16,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
And if it does, it will open up whole new areas of law and technology, as the inevitable challenges to security, accuracy, and access arise. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:50 am by Greenberg Glusker
Greenberg Glusker’s Environmental Litigation Group plays a leading role in these cases that are determining the future quality of life in local communities,” said Greenberg Glusker Managing Partner Norman H. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
"In this instance, said the court, Rosenblum "has a clear legal right to judicial intervention to prevent the Board from continuing with its hearing before OATH.Although the Education had made a final decision not to proceed with charges against Rosenbaum, the Board argued that, notwithstanding that decision, Section 2603 (h) authorizes it to proceed with the administrative hearing, to impose a fine, and to recommend that Rosenblum be suspended or dismissed.In response, Supreme… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
When it does begin, the Aossey trial will be held before the Northern Iowa District’s chief judge, Linda R. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 4:45 pm
If a malpractice award does not get paid because of bankruptcy, the state no longer considers a doctor in violation for not paying it, preserving his or her medical license. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 2:32 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
From her blog: *MOUSE PRINT: And worse, Joy does not have a skincare line of products, as she explains in the video below. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
That legislative bodies have extended various statutory protections to nonhuman animals does not inexorably create a common law or constitutional right to liberty. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:03 am by Walter Olson
My Darling, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Flan, Sixteen Carrots, No Country for Old Menus, and All That Bloomberg Allows (h/t @JoshGreenman, @bethanyshondark, @AnthonyBialy, @robsolo, @RobGeorge, @JoshGreenman again, @KerryPicket, @Fausta, and @Ericatwitts). [read post]
29 May 2007, 3:42 am
RE 34,815, entitled "Flexible flail trimmer with combined guide and guard"); claim meaning "is determined by using intrinsic evidence, which includes the claims, the specification, and the prosecution history and by using extrinsic evidence, which includes dictionaries," but "[h]owever, extrinsic evidence in determining the meaning of a claim may be less reliable than intrinsic evidence"; discussion of phrase "generally planar surface" as being… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 9:43 am
So what does this text mean and why can't designers just use plain English? [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:03 pm by Joe Whitworth
It is on this basis that the government does not allow sales of raw milk or cream,” said Bent Høie, Minister of Health and Care Services. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The bill does not require an agency to identify funding for stewardship of properties to be protected, but the bill at least gives agencies the option to identify such endowments and lays out rules regarding the management and investment of the endowments. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:44 pm by James Hamilton
§ 80a-29(h), Congress expressly authorized private suits for damages against insiders of closed-end investment companies who make short-swing profits.Congress created a second express private right of action in 1970 when it added Section 36(b) to the ICA, which allows shareholders to sue an investment company’s advisor and its affiliates for breach of certain fiduciary duties relating to management fees. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 4:34 pm by HowardGutman
H, attaching Letters) Problem Did Not Substantially Impair Use, Value, or Safety “It is generally understood by courts and commentators across the nation that a trivial complaint or merely aggravating defect does not constitute a “substantial impairment. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
[H]ow one feels about the death penalty is irrelevant to whether the high court should reconsider its Louisiana decision. [read post]