Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 14,922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
App. 225, 177 P.3d 745, 48 A.L.R.6th 659. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
This isn’t an outright win for Combs, though. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:05 am
[T]he pistol . . .was very old. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:50 pm
Es cierto que el legislador prefiere otros términos mas modernos. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
” More specifically, section 2(a)(1) of the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act would require “[a] person who creates a training dataset, or alters a training dataset (…) in a significant manner, that is used in building a generative AI system” to submit to the Register of Copyrights a notice that contains: “(A) a sufficiently detailed summary of any copyrighted works used – (i) in the training dataset (…); or (ii) to alter the training dataset… [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
So far apart that they don’t even keep in any kind of contact anymore. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Quadrant 2 activities make us more efficient and productive, and ultimately make us feel the best, in the long-run. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:10 pm
DeLuca, Scott P v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
Ehly, 317 Or. 66, 75, 854 P.2d 421 (Oregon Supreme Court 1993). [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) 2 October 1995 (ICTY Appeals Chamber) para 58.) [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Such suits are called “qui tam” actions, Latin for “I don’t know what I’m saying. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm
Ogalehanded out T-Melt P samples at the expo, then theywould serve as prior art to the plasma fluorination techniqueof the claimed methods. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:03 am
López y en Rivera Pérez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
See Donald P. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
The administration’s overall probability of success (P) is equal to: pt + (1 - pt)(ps x pp) The administration may think that pt is so close to 1 that the rest of the terms in the equation don’t matter. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 am
, y (2) ¿cuáles son las consecuencias legales de no emplazar al Secretario de Justicia en una demanda de impugnación de confiscación dentro del término jurisdiccional según se establece en el Art. 15 de la Ley Uniforme de Confiscaciones de 2011? [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
William McGeveran, University of Minnesota Law School & Mark P. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
This "argument fail[ed]" for several reasons: (1) the expert who supposedly supported the claim didn't treat any of the plaintiffs and couldn't say what the actual treaters would have done; (2) plaintiffs couldn't prove that the nondisclosed risk "was sufficiently high that it would have changed the treating physician's decision," and (3) because the risk wasn't the one the plaintiffs suffered, "the… [read post]
