Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 28,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2024, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v OHIM). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
United States Forest Service v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
According to the Appellate Division, §75 requires that:The charges must be reasonably specific in light of the circumstances, which include "whether the interval ascribed for a particular offense is so excessive on its face that it is unreasonable; whether the respondent has exerted diligent efforts to state the time more specifically; and whether, under the circumstances, the designated period is reasonable. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
The justices granted the states’ petition in Arizona v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:47 am
See, e.g., Alston v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:07 am
It concluded that, in light of the Washington State’s Supreme Court opinion in Scott v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The form and substance of these duties and responsibilities are considered in light of two recent developments. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Following the recent grant of cert. in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Eleonora analyses the social network’s decision in light of EU and US’ originality criteria, as well as moral rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:45 am
" Zorach v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:04 pm
(See, e.g., Manzanares v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:27 am
” Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:46 pm
Yesterday's opinion (Bayer CropScience v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
In light of Clift, one question for the judge will be whether an assertion that the Claimant was probably guilty of his girlfriend’s murder was a proportionate means of doing so. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
(Additional STL coverage here.)The case cite is Experience Hendrix LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:03 am
Minor v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:11 am
Circuit Court of Appeals found undue hardship in Walker v. [read post]
