Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 8861 - 8880 of 29,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, 17-1340 Issue: Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
In 2015, PG&E sought an extension of a lease from the State Lands Commission to continue operating the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant until 2025 when it is planned for decommission at the conclusion of its FERC-issued operating license term. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
The 2014 terrorist attack at the Kunming railway station did not amount to hostilities that might arguably trigger international humanitarian law rather than IHRL, as the attacks were not characterized by sufficient “intensity and organization” under Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
His retaliation claim failed because his placement on a performance improvement plan was not an adverse action; nor was his transfer to a new position, considering it involved the same location and supervisory level, and he received a pay raise (Payan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Companies must also have and implement a written HACCP plan to control such hazards. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:32 pm by Amy Howe
Addressing President Donald Trump’s promise to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am by Elena Chachko
Iran brought the case after President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear deal (known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) in May and revoked sanctions relief provided in the framework of the agreement. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:42 am by SHG
There’s been much written about the Fifth Circuit’s en banc ruling in Alvarez v. [read post]