Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 8881 - 8900 of 30,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2018, 9:06 pm by Adam Levitin
 First, Merit does not prevent the selling shareholders in an LBO from raising the settlement payment safe harbor of section 546(e). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:00 am by Liisa Speaker
She emphasized that, based on established case law, a third party does not have standing to create a custody dispute “unless the third party is a guardian of the child or has a substantive right of entitlement to custody of the child” (Ruppel v Lesner, 421 Mich 559 (1984)). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant's arguments, as far as they are relevant to the present decision, may be summarised as follows:The idea behind Rule 71(3) EPC was that an applicant could re-enter the examination proceedings if it did not agree with the proposed claims. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant's arguments, as far as they are relevant to the present decision, may be summarised as follows:The idea behind Rule 71(3) EPC was that an applicant could re-enter the examination proceedings if it did not agree with the proposed claims. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:54 pm
GENERAL LIABILITY – "BODILY INJURY" – MENTAL INJURY Incorporated Village of Old Westbury v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:01 am by Scott Bomboy
Does this case affect the political influence of unions? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:12 am by First Mondays
We’re switching it up and spending the whole episode on one case: United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am by Myers Freelance
The post Competitive Keyword Ads Go to Court: Edible Arrangements v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
Which points back to Shapiro v Ettenson, a case I’ve written about several times before (here, here, and here). [read post]