Search for: "In re Roberts" Results 8881 - 8900 of 13,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Roberts and Scalia scuffle with him and suddenly Alito comes to the rescue with a great hypothetical: Let's say Congress says this to the States: We have got great news for you. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 4:37 am
"It takes them a long time to secure employment," says Melissa Roberts, a sex-offender specialist with the Department of Corrections. [read post]
I previously blogged about Lewiston mass murderer Robert Card, and the fact that he clearly committed the crime of terrorizing well before he engaged in his mass murder spree on October 25, 2023. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 1:30 am by Abigail Perkiss
Scholars Norman Gross and Leonard Vieire point to the nomination proceedings of Judge Robert Bork as the impetus for this shift. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
But someday perhaps we might benefit from a re-envisioning of the qualifications for the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm by Adam Thierer
They are not helping us get more 3rd party voices into the American political system; they’re making it harder than ever for them to even exist. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:23 am
Roberts, Jr., took — or was given — the assignment of crafting a spare 17-page opinion that did as little as necessary to get a result. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:57 am
" Moore shot back: "You are either for the death penalty or you're against the death penalty .... [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:23 am
Robert Vastine, President of the Coalition of Service Industries argues that the pick is very astute politically. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 11:58 pm
  Aerial acrobatic maneuvers are prohibited below 1,500 feet for obvious reasons:  they're somewhat dangerous and we don't like planes to fall out of the sky. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:42 am
Justice Scalia is making two points here, and they're both false. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:56 am
Roberts, Jr., the group -- Wisconsin Right to Life -- asked the Court to reconsider one facet of the 2003 decision in McConnell v. [read post]