Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 8881 - 8900
of 15,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
C 11-00504 SBA (N.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
(b) If there is no surviving issue, to the decedent’s parent or parents equally. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
§ 1030(a)(5)(A) and (c)(4)(B). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Earlier this month, a panel of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeal decided a relatively straight forward case by reversing the trial court’s exclusion of a forensic accountant’s damages calculation. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
Not All Copyright Owners Can Exploit The Copyright By way of context, the Ninth Circuit’s en banc majority opinion in Silvers v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm
Restou célebre a frase “nothing works” de Robert Martinson[4] em 1974 que, embora tratando das questões relacionadas ao cárcere, especialmente ao tratamento dos apenados com privação da liberdade, pode sintetizar a crise geral do sistema penal e, consequentemente, da criminologia. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm
Restou célebre a frase “nothing works” de Robert Martinson[4] em 1974 que, embora tratando das questões relacionadas ao cárcere, especialmente ao tratamento dos apenados com privação da liberdade, pode sintetizar a crise geral do sistema penal e, consequentemente, da criminologia. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:17 pm
This was one of the most fought over issues in the Louboutin v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm
How will the Supreme Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:49 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, reversing a trial court’s refusal to enter an order enjoining disclosure of confidential information, recently held that the lower court erred when it (a) ruled that the moving party must satisfy all six trade secret balancing test factors, (b) rejected a party’s request for an evidentiary hearing with respect to a key factual dispute as to which the parties submitted conflicting… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
A former general counsel of a diagnostic lab, who participated in a qui tam action, violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, ruled the Second Circuit (United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, October 25, 2013, Cabranes, J). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
This is an unusual qui tam action, United States of America, Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
DETLOR v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
The district court granted WildTangent’s pre-answer motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 6:03 pm
Few do. c. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:57 pm
(C) Reduce punitives to $125,000. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session17/Pages/ResDecStat.aspx (b) Examine the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, available in the six official languages of the United Nations. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:41 am
A child shall not be emancipated if one fails to continue his or her education because of some injury, illness or other cause beyond the child’s control. c. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am
It sorted Haycock's entries into the following categories: (a) vague entries, (b) irrelevant entries and (c) block billed entries. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
The landmark case of Guggenheimer v Ginzberg sets forth the guideline that whether plaintiff has stated a cause of action, thereby defeating defendants' motions, the court will consider whether the plaintiff has a cause of action rather than whether he has properly stated one. [read post]
