Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 8881 - 8900 of 156,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Bloate v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 5:50 am by Olivier Sylvain
But, as the Supreme Court explained in its Moody v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 23 NY3d at 247; see NY Const, art V, § 1; State Finance Law § 8 [1], [2], [2-b], [3], [7]). [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlIn re M.K.T. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
Stanford Law student Ruthie Zemel offers this brief preview of Tuesday’s argument in Giles v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm by Laura Orr
The following blog post got me to thinking that a legal citation lesson for non-attorneys might be a challenge worth attempting, though I surely won’t get it right the first time.3 Geeks and a Law Blog: Bloomberg Law Gets Cited By A New Jersey Court… A First for “___ BL ___” (citing to United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:55 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a relatively brief opinion today in Prescott v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am by Eric Goldman
Reisch acted under color of law because ” the interactive space of Defendant’s Twitter account is controlled by Defendant, in her capacity as a state legislator. [read post]