Search for: "State v. N. N." Results 8881 - 8900 of 21,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
It is clear that U.S. statutes would prevail in any direct conflict with TRIPS, as Congress has specified that "[n]o provision . . . that is inconsistent with any law of the United States shall have effect." [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Dennis Crouch
” And, more to the point, “[a]n authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
When a project not being built on state or county land meets the definition of "use" of such lands triggering chapter 343 environmental review - Nuuanu Valley Ass'n v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
, 68 Mass.App.Ct. 582, 603 n. 50 (2007).Hardiman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 7412(n)(1)(A) is unreasonable because it refused to consider a key factor (costs) when determining whether it is appropriate to regulate hazardous air pollutants emitted by electric utilities. [read post]