Search for: "United States v. Robert"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 9,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
Analysis As Marty Lederman and Robert Litt have pointed out, it has been the longstanding view of the Executive branch that this and similar statutes must be read to give the President the final word on whether and how classified information will be provided to the congressional intelligence committees. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
App. 2061 et seq.), and title VI of the Robert T. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
CrimLaw’s response is pragmatic, and Robert Ambrogi urges lawyers to call a spade a spade. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Whereas the the Senate bill requests information on the special counsel investigation as a whole, the House bill has a more specific ask: Each report … shall include but not be limited to … any evidence of criminal activity that implicates the President, any person within the Executive Office of the President at the time of the report or any time prior, or any person appointed as an officer of the United States by the President (regardless of whether or not that… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 am
State Medicaid Fraud Control Units. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
United States, in which the justices rejected the argument that the structure of the Federal Trade Commission, with five commissioners who could be removed only for cause, was unconstitutional, is an exception to that rule, but he urged the justices not to extend the exception. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
., decided today by the Indiana Court of Appeals (Judge Terry Crone, joined by Judges Nancy Vaidik and Robert Altice): M.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:10 am
Doubtless they were constrained by a powerful democratic norm, reflected in the Supreme Court’s pointed rejection in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
But his skepticism about oaths certainly extends to quasi-religious oaths like those exacted from the President and, under Article VI, all public officials, whether state or national. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:44 am
The basis for this was most recently stated in Owenby v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Judge Sarah Vance’s opinion in Burst v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
