Search for: "Best v. Best" Results 8901 - 8920 of 41,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee            In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Among the most important outstanding issues as impeachment moves to the Senate is whether senators will attempt to obtain the testimony of senior executive branch officials who have, to date, declined to testify. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The House’s best response, I think, is that the wholesale obstruction of an impeachment inquiry rises above traditional oversight disputes and Congress can, and should, exercise its constitutional checks on the executive branch—including impeachment—to counter such extreme assertions of authority. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
However, the Framers recognized that it would be unseemly at best for the person who would assume the presidency in the event of conviction by the Senate to preside over the president’s trial. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:10 am
Sandstrom, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, January 3, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
And remember, he who laughs last, laughs best. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
And remember, he who laughs last, laughs best. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
And remember, he who laughs last, laughs best. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court’s Rule 23 decisions have had the effect of forcing the plaintiffs’ bar to “re-boot” the architecture of their class action theories.[2] At least one result was the decision three years ago in Tyson Foods v. [read post]