Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 8901 - 8920 of 18,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
His interests are in European legal history, Roman law, and comparative law.Thursday, March 14 (4:30 pm)“Executive Power, Officer Indemnity, and A Government of Laws, Not of Men: A Re-Reading of The Charming Betsy and Little v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:47 am by Stewart Baker
The panel then discusses recent charges brought by the Justice Department, and two arrests, aimed at China’s alleged attempt to harass dissidents living in the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:00 pm
The measure prohibits most abortions after six weeks into pregnancy — long before many women even know they’re pregnant. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
 This would be because this piece of EU legislation does not allow Member States to allocate a portion of the fair compensation to the publishers if there is no obligation for the publishers to ensure that they pass on this part, directly or indirectly, to the authors.In its analysis the ECS endorsed the AG Opinion on this point, and submitted that the CJEU should (re-)affirm the author principle, ie initial ownership of copyright for authors. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:09 am by Anushka Limaye
Stephanie Zable analyzed how the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sessions v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:05 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today issued a ruling that makes it easier for regulators in secondary jurisdictions to impose sanctions for misconduct occurring years—or even decades—earlier.In McLean v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maybe the state doesn't need to regulate what's in a local department's disciplinary files so long as they're open. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 6:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
V, Sec. 4) permits a panel of three CCA judges to consider habeas writs, but not individual judges as is this court's practice. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:23 am
Yesterday was a big IP day at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), with both the judgment in Copydan (private copying levies) [here] and the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen in Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs (plant variety rights) [here].However, while browsing the Curia calendar and press releases, this Kat's attention was drawn to another case which, although not strictly IP-related, might be very relevant IP-wise, especially for copyright… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:36 am
" (NYT).The oral argument is today.If you're trying to remember why this is still a live issue after the wedding-cake case:The court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop on an idiosyncratic ground that is not at issue in the new case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
 On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic… [read post]